Test of new forum in same category as Chit-chat

Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 9:47 amThe quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog!
Does a forum in the same category as Chi-chat respond any differently? 30 seconds or so to publish in Chi-chat is just unacceptable.
The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog!
Does a forum in the same category as Chi-chat respond any differently? 30 seconds or so to publish in Chi-chat is just unacceptable.

Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 9:51 amNot much - that took around 25s to publish. Looks like a separate Category is needed to get much faster speeds but it, too will slow down as the Category fills. There's an underlying problem with the Asgaros Forum plugin that is resulting in performance degradation as content grows in the Category. And the author is not responding to support requests and has not for maybe a year or more...
Not much - that took around 25s to publish. Looks like a separate Category is needed to get much faster speeds but it, too will slow down as the Category fills. There's an underlying problem with the Asgaros Forum plugin that is resulting in performance degradation as content grows in the Category. And the author is not responding to support requests and has not for maybe a year or more...

Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 11:07 amHostinger suggested Optimising the Forum's database tables. Did that. So how long to post this one?
Hostinger suggested Optimising the Forum's database tables. Did that. So how long to post this one?

Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 11:09 amQuote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 11:07 amHostinger suggested Optimising the Forum's database tables. Did that. So how long to post this one?
Almost a minute! Hope that does not persist!
The Optimise function was apparently unsupported by any WP tables so it did a Recreate and Analyze.
Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 11:07 amHostinger suggested Optimising the Forum's database tables. Did that. So how long to post this one?
Almost a minute! Hope that does not persist!
The Optimise function was apparently unsupported by any WP tables so it did a Recreate and Analyze.

Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 11:13 amAbout 50s but both done in my head so, essentially the same. No better. Bad move!
About 50s but both done in my head so, essentially the same. No better. Bad move!

Quote from Tom Holden on 2025-09-02, 11:15 amunder 25s that time with a stopwatch so there is some kind of background indexing or caching that has restored speed to the range in which it was.
under 25s that time with a stopwatch so there is some kind of background indexing or caching that has restored speed to the range in which it was.